What you didn’t know about the Banaue Rice Terraces
FYI, it's not created by the Chinese
Apr 13, 2019
In case you haven’t heard, travel publisher and website Lonely Planet drew ire over a video that claims that Ifugao’s Banaue Rice Terraces were made by the Chinese. The video, which was originally posted on Facebook, was caught to have the following text: “These mudwalled terraces were first built around 2000 years ago by the Chinese.” No source was cited to back this statement.
Dear @lonelyplanet , the Banaue Rice Terraces were built by Filipino indigenous people, not by the Chinese. (Screengrabbed from a video posted in Lonely Planet’s facebook page) pic.twitter.com/HzHlOuE3we
— Jose Ruperto Martir (@AltPCOOSec) March 30, 2019
Netizens were quick to point out the error in the video, defending that it was the Philippines’ indigenous people who built the terraces. Lonely Planet took down the video since it went viral and vowed to look through it. As of writing, Lonely Planet has yet to issue a formal statement regarding the matter.
The Banaue Rice Terraces went through a rigorous screening process before being named as a United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) world heritage site. It has to meet the criteria that it must “be an outstanding example of a traditional human settlement or land-use which is representative of a culture,” among others. On UNESCO’s website, they write that the terraces “are all the product of the Ifugao ethnic group, a minority community that has occupied these mountains for thousands of years.”
The actual age of the terraces, however, remains a mystery to this day. American anthropologists Roy F. Burton and Henry Otley Beyer assert that the terraces are over 2,000 years old. On the other hand, a number of scholars also argue that the terraces merely date back to the arrival of the Spanish in the country.
A 2019 study published in the Journal of Field Archaeology show that the earliest obtained radiocarbon dates from the site were from 1867 B.C, while noting that the “earlier dates do not imply the presence of irrigated rice agriculture.” Previous research made it difficult for archaeologists to determine the exact age of the terraces due to modern-day agricultural activities.
But here’s a fun fact: In the same study, it was shown that Banaue happened to be far more advanced in its time. It has an extensive agricultural system that goes beyond the grand flight of rice terraces that we normally see. The Ifugao terraces’ ecology had two types of forest cover: Inalahan, which comprises of “upslope public forests” that had open-access to communal areas, and muyong or privately-owned woodlots.
In between inalahan and muyong was a field called habal, which were “unirrigated slopeland, cultivated with root crops.” The rice terraces are called payo, which are protected by stone walls called tuping and irrigated through a channel called alak. At the foot of the terraces is a village called boble.
Today, local farmers continue to plant tinawon—an indigenous rice variety that grows within nine to 10 months. The local industry also continues to flourish with the increasing amount of tourist arrivals every year.
With these details in mind, it all boils down to the fact that the heritage value of the Banaue Rice Terraces’ doesn’t mean any less just because its actual age is unclear. More than that, the terraces have brought livelihood to the people of Ifugao for hundreds of years. It’s a natural wonder that, as multiple studies agree, is created solely by the people who lived there in the first place. Not the Chinese, not by anyone.
Header image courtesy of EV Espiritu of Inquirer.net
Read more by Jill Chua:
Climate change has turned this famous ube jam purple to white
Taffy Brodesser-Akner is the funny, smart, feminist writer you should be reading right now
Filipino-American prima ballerina Stella Abrera returns to Manila for a two-night fund-raiser
ASEAN Tingin film fest is back for its 3rd year
Remembering Martial Law: ‘ML’ now available for streaming